Since its inception in the 1950s, the Alberta Advisory Committee for Educational Studies (AACES) has made an important contribution to educational research in Alberta. The main purpose of the AACES is to encourage and financially support educational studies. It may also support publications designed to disseminate the results of educational studies. AACES currently involves a partnership among the faculties of education at the Universities of Alberta, Calgary and Lethbridge and the Alberta Teachers’ Association. Until recently Alberta Education (now Alberta Learning) was a contributing supporter.
A Brief History of AACESTop of page
||Founded by the University of Alberta, the Department of Education, the Alberta Teachers’ Association, the Alberta School Trustee’s Association and the Home and School Association
||Founded the Alberta Journal of Educational Research
||The University of Lethbridge joins AACES
||AACES supports two thriving journals: the Alberta Journal of Educational Research and the Journal of Educational Thought
||In its first 30 years, AACES funded some 240 research projects
Guidelines for Grant ApplicationsTop of page
Am I Eligible to Apply for an AACES Grant?
- To apply for an AACES grant, an individual must be formally affiliated with one of the contributing organizations (the University of Lethbridge, the University of Alberta, the University of Calgary or the Alberta Teachers' Association) in one of the following categories:
- a certificated teacher who is a member of the ATA
- Faculty of Education sessional instructor
- Faculty of Education member
- Faculty of Education professor emeritus
- Faculty of Education adjunct
- Faculty of Education post-doctoral fellow
What Types of Projects does AACES Support?
- Grants in excess of $6,000 are awarded rarely because of limited available resources.
- AACES is particularly interested in projects designed to improve teacher preparation or to benefit elementary and secondary education. Preference will be given to projects that are investigating educational issues or questions.
- Graduate students may not be the principal investigator on projects that involve their thesis or dissertation; however, graduate students involved in research funded by AACES may use part or all of the work for a university degree or course subject to the approval of the principal investigator.
- AACES will not support activities whose major purpose is to produce commercial products (such as books, texts, curriculum guides and audiovisual aids) or that are deemed to constitute professional development.
How Do I Apply for an AACES Grant?
- Download and fill out each section of the grant application form.
- Written submissions will be accepted in English or French. Proposals submitted in French require a summary of the research project in English.
- The Ethics Approval Report or the application to the Ethics Review Committee must be included with the grant application. It would be prudent to ensure the required information to complete your research project is available from the source cited in your proposal.
- Mail or deliver eight copies of the completed application form and each of the attachments to the AACES secretariat office by 4:30 pm on the published deadline
Assemble the application form and all attachments into one document, attach the document to an email and send it to email@example.com by 4:30 pm on the published deadline. Faxed copies will not be accepted.
How are Grant Recipients Chosen?
- AACES meets twice a year, once after the spring deadline and once after the fall deadline, to review applications that meet the above criteria. In the case of each application, the committee will rule in one of three possible ways: (a) to accept it for funding, (b) to reject it or (c) to recommend that the applicant revise and resubmit it by the next application deadline. Resubmitted proposals will be considered as part of a regular subsequent competition. Decisions of the committee are final.
What Expenditures Qualify for an AACES Grant?
- Among the expenses that AACES may reimburse, in whole or in part, for a project that has been accepted are:
- research assistants’ salaries
- telephone and postage charges
- non-capital materials costs, such as paper, pencils, tapes and film
- research-related travel expenses
- transcription costs
- consultants’ fees
- release time for school-based staff (provided that the school or school jurisdiction involved agrees to match the amount requested from AACES)
- Among the expenses that AACES will not reimburse are:
- indirect costs. Researchers are encouraged to list this item as part of the university’s funding for the proposal.
- honoraria for the principal researcher or researchers
- capital expenses exceeding $250
- travel expenses associated with attending a conference in the researcher's community.
What Happens if I Qualify for a Grant?
- Projects must be initiated within one year following the date on which the grant was approved.
- Grants funds awarded for research will not be released until AACES has received an Ethics Review Committee Approval Report. This report must be received within one year following the date on which AACES approved the grant, or the grant will be forfeited.
- Grants funds awarded for research being conducted in a school or schools will not be released until AACES has received a school district and a school approval report. This report must be received within one year following the date on which AACES approved the grant, or the grant will be forfeited.
- AACES grants will be disbursed only to an audited account on which the grant recipient may draw.
- Grant recipients are expected to complete their project within two years, although they may apply in writing to the AACES secretariat for an extension of up to one year.
- Grant recipients must submit a copy of the final report, along with an abstract of not more than 500 words, to the AACES secretariat within six months of the termination date of the project. If the final report is not received within the specified time, AACES will not consider further proposals from the principal investigator for a period of three years. AACES will also inform the dean of the relevant faculty of education or the superintendent of the relevant school jurisdiction in writing that the final report was not received by the deadline. Grant recipients who fail to meet all obligations within two years of the termination date of their grant will not be considered for future grants.
- AACES reserves the right to circulate the final reports of projects to participating organizations and interested parties.
- Grant recipients who publish articles resulting from AACES-funded research should submit a copy of their articles to the AACES secretariat.
Obtaining an Application FormTop of page
Application forms are available in writable PDF format. Simply download the form, fill it out and e-mail it to firstname.lastname@example.org or mail it to the following address:
Secretary, Alberta Advisory Committee for Educational Studies
c/o The Alberta Teachers' Association
100, 3016 5 Avenue NE
Calgary AB T2A 6K4
The next deadline for applications is April 12, 2017 at 4:30 pm.
To find out more about AACES, contact either of these individuals:
- Doreen Link at 403-265-2672 in Calgary (1-800-332-1280 from elsewhere in Alberta)
- Jean-Claude Couture at 780-447-9462 in Edmonton (1-800-232-7208 from elsewhere in Alberta)
Grants Approved in 2016
“Understanding Perspectives on Practicum Supervision by University Supervisors and Student Teachers in a Faculty of Education: A Case Study”
Dawn Burleigh, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Lethbridge
Field experiences are an integral component of any teacher education program. Teacher education programs have attempted to address the potentially limiting, normative influence of practical experiences by enhancing the coherence of the various elements of preservice professional development through the establishment of close relationships between universities and schools and having tenured faculty and other instructors working with student teachers in the field as part of their teaching responsibility. Involvement from university supervisors ensures the integration of theory and practice to prepare the student teachers for success in a variety of classrooms and educational contexts. Nonetheless, the influence of university supervisors on practicum experiences has not been widely investigated. This research study will address this gap by investigating the supervisory process and the experiences of both university supervisors and student teachers during practicum supervision. The results of this case study research will focus on effective approaches to supervision, means of enhancing student teaching practice and the role relationships play in the supervision process.
“Academic Vocabulary Learning in Grade 3 – 4: Which words? How many?”
Hetty Roessingh, Professor, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary
Grade 3 – 4 has been widely recognized as the shift from “learning to read” to “reading to learn.” Making meaning of written text is dependent on having a robust vocabulary. Written literacy, similarly, requires significant vocabulary knowledge to engage with the increasingly complex demands of curriculum and academic tasks associated with expository genres. The key predictor of succeeding with these school related tasks is control over a large and sophisticated vocabulary repertoire. Language sample analysis (LSA) – analyzing students’ writing samples affords insights into their control over productive vocabulary. Time series data consisting of writing samples (N=260) taken one year apart (ie the end of Grade 3 and the end of Grade 4) are first analyzed for writing quality standard following a trait based rubric. They are then digitized, corrected for spelling, and submitted to online tools available in the public domain (www.lextutor.ca/vp/kids) that generate various indices of vocabulary use. This research will investigate patterns and thresholds of vocabulary use at four quality standards (excellent, proficient, satisfactory, limited), producing lists of words that distinguish high proficiency from low proficiency samples. These will provide useful starting points for classroom practitioners to teach targeted words in contexts that are meaningful and engaging for young learners. Children who are linguistically vulnerable, including English language learners, Aboriginal children and children raised in poverty are particularly dependent on their teachers to make the difference in their language development. On these counts, we must and can do much better in Alberta classrooms.
“Middle school literacy: A three-year study of the impact of an Indigo Love of Reading Foundation Grant on student engagement and motivation for reading and teachers' perceptions of themselves as teachers of reading”
Robin M Bright, Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Lethbridge
Wilson Middle School staff in Alberta, Canada, identified that students’ low literacy levels were having a negative impact on engagement and academic success. School administration and lead teachers proposed an initiative to address this area through a six-week exploratory option block in the daily timetable. All students received a daily literacy block for six weeks taught by all staff. Students were grouped by reading levels established from the Canadian Test of Basic Skills scores with ranges falling between: Kindergarten–Grade 3, Grades 4–6, Grades 7–8, and Grades 10+. The staff was guided through several professional development sessions to develop the literacy initiative consisting of daily 50-minute classes. The teachers offered students daily and direct instruction to improve reading through phonics, phonemic awareness, comprehension, vocabulary and fluency using a variety of literature at the students’ reading levels. After the first year of implementing the six-week exploratory, the Motivation for Reading Questionnaire based on the research work of Guthrie and Wigfield (1997) was administered; students’ motivation for reading was targeted in an effort to elevate student attitudes towards and engagement with reading. Results from the motivation survey indicated that the majority of students showed an increased interest in reading and reported increased positive feelings about their reading. Having recently been awarded a large national literacy grant to purchase books with, the proposed study will examine the continued impact of this award on students’ engagement and motivation for reading, teachers’ perceptions of themselves as teachers of reading, and the families’ perceptions of their children as readers over three years.
Grants Approved in 2015
“Argumentation in-the-making in/for Socio-scientific Problem Solving”
Mijung Kim, Associate Professor, Elementary Education, University of Alberta
According to the definition of scientific literacy by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (2014), scientific reasoning, evidence-based decision making and problem solving are the goals of science education for the 21st century citizenship. Scientific argumentation has recently emerged as an important tool to develop children’s reasoning and problem solving in science and mathematics education. Toulmin’s Argumentation Patterns has been widely accepted as an effective tool to teach argumentation, yet, in recent years, it has been criticized for the linear structure and lack of epistemic criteria to understand the complexity of children’s reasoning process. Educational researchers generally and Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics educators specifically have become interested in dialogical pedagogies of argumentation to understand children’s reasoning in real life situations. This study aims to investigate argumentation as a tool to develop children’s collective reasoning and problem solving in socio-scientific and technological issues. This study particularly questions how teachers and children engage and transform argumentation strategies (eg, evidence-based claim, critical moves, etc) in problem solving processes and how they internalize the culture and skills of argumentation through dialogical relations. Two Grade 5-6 classes will participate in an interpretive case study. Video-data of classroom activities, interviews and field notes will be collected and analyzed through interaction analysis and thematic coding strategies to analyze the structure of events and the temporal organization of classroom interactions and knowledge building. The study findings are expected to yield critical insights into children’s appropriation of scientific argumentation and suggest new approaches to science teaching toward children’s reasoning and problem solving.
“A Phenomenological Investigation of Adolescent Newcomers’ Experiences of School Integration”
Anusha Kassan, Assistant Professor, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary
The aim of this study is to develop an in-depth, contextual understanding of adolescent newcomers’ integration into the Canadian school system. As a large and growing segment of the population, immigrant and refugee youth play a vital role in the school fabric and future of Canada. Entrance into the school system is, for most newcomers, their first introduction to the host culture within which they reside and consequently can impact their community involvement, career pathways and contributions to society (Areepattamannil & Freeman, 2008; Rossiter & Rossiter, 2009; Suarez-Orozco & Suarez-Orozco, 2001). Yet numerous studies have highlighted the diverse range of challenges that adolescent newcomers face as they enter high school in Canada (Naraghi, 2013; Ngo, 2009; Li, 2010; Stodolska, 2008). These findings point to a critical need to understand how to improve the academic and social transition of newcomer youth. Through a phenomenological research design, this study explores the phenomenon of “school integration” among newcomer youth in Calgary, thus positioning youth themselves as experts of their own experience and the types of services they need during their academic adjustment (Ngo, 2009). Participants will be recruited through a public high school in the city, which hosts numerous adolescent newcomers every year. The central research questions to be investigated in this study include (a) How do adolescent newcomers describe their integration into high school in Canada? And (b) What do adolescent newcomers need as they integrate into high school in Canada? The adolescent perspective is vital in order to expand our understanding of the challenges newcomers face at school and inform future efforts to deliver accessible, relevant and culturally sensitive resources and programs.
Grants Approved in 2014
“Examining Specific Cognitive Abilities as Potential Contributors to an Efficacious Model of Academic Intervention”
Damien C Cormier, Assistant Professor, Educational Psychology, University of Alberta
The proposed study will examine the extent to which response to an academic intervention can be predicted from a student’s specific cognitive ability to store and retrieve new information. The objective of the study is to provide a relatively brief screening procedure using a subset of cognitive tests, to distinguish between students who are likely to benefit from academic intervention, from students who should instead be immediately referred for a psycho-educational assessment. Currently, there is no process in place to distinguish these groups and, consequently, academic interventions are delivered to all struggling learners. Thus, an effective screening procedure would help reduce the likelihood of squandering limited educational resources (eg time and money) for students who are not benefitting from them. The additional benefit of a screening process is that students not expected to respond to intervention would immediately be referred for a psycho-educational assessment. Thereby allowing students with intensive needs to be identified and access supports sooner, rather than waiting 8-12 weeks for interventions to be delivered and found to be unsuccessful.
The proposed study will help to bridge an existing gap between psychologists and educators, by providing a collaborative approach to supporting struggling learners. In addition, it will provide an innovative approach to using cognitive measures in conjunction with academic interventions, which is a practice that has yet to be viewed as worthwhile in the fields of education and psychology.
“Playing on Words: Multimodal Composing in the Elementary School Classroom”
Kimberly Lenters, Assistant Professor, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary
The research project for which I am currently seeking funding will engage students in an inquiry into the multimodal meaning-making potential of storybooks that employ a “scrapbook” format and lead them in the production of digital scrapbooks. Multimodal texts employ a range of communicational modalities – visual, auditory, gestural and spatial, in addition to the linguistic (written) mode. The objective of this research is to explore the potential of investigating and creating multimodal picture books for language and literacy development with learners of varying language and cultural backgrounds. This project simultaneously addresses two problems in literacy education with elementary school students – the need to instruct young students in how to better “read” and construct multimodal texts with which they interact daily in their out-of-school literacy practices and give attention to the potential support this kind of work holds for EAL students. The study proposes to address these problems through digital storytelling. Students will inquire into the kind of communicational “play” found in multimodal picture books that use a “scrapbook” format and subsequently produce their own digital scrapbooks employing digital software that incorporates a range of communicational modalities. The site has been identified and my study dovetails with the social studies unit in which Grade 4 students at the site are currently engaged with their teachers – a unit that looks at the history of Alberta and their family’s “entry” into the timeline of Alberta history.
“How is Reading Fluency Achieved?”
George Georgiou, Associate Professor, Educational Psychology, University of Alberta
Reading fluency, defined as the ability to read text quickly, accurately, and with proper expression, is undoubtedly one of the most important components of reading (Wolf & Katzir, 2001). Despite its acknowledged importance, it remains unclear how reading fluency is achieved (Kuhn, Schwanenflugel & Meisinger, 2010). In order to identify words quickly children need to have readily available, high-quality orthographic knowledge (Share, 1995; Shaywitz, 2008). However, whether this orthographic knowledge should be seen as an accumulation of word-specific knowledge or as a well-developed associate network of sub-lexical units is still under debate. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine how reading fluency is achieved by contrasting two prominent theoretical accounts of how words are processed (serial processing vs parallel processing) in three different grade levels (Grades 1, 3 and 5) and in 4 different languages (English, Greek, Chinese and Korean). The findings will have important theoretical and practical implications. In terms of theory, the findings will help us better understand how reading fluency is achieved and whether its development follows the same trajectory across different writing systems (alphabetic: English, Greek; ideographic: Chinese; alpha syllabic: Korean). In terms of the practical implications, if we gain a better understanding of how reading fluency is achieved, then we will be better equipped to develop appropriate instructional materials and intervention programs to teach it. This will directly benefit our teachers in Alberta because we plan to post instructional materials and resources related to our findings on the website of the Reading Research Laboratory at the University of Alberta. In addition, the findings will shape our teaching of preservice and inservice teachers that attend our literacy courses at the university.